Presenting a community engagement
plan containing various activities for specific studies is
not as easy as one would expect, especially when it comes to a point of
presenting expenses attached to the
activities. Most Principal Investigators are always keen not to argue with you
when shedding more light about planned activities so that communities are more
aware about their study; they are always interested to hear more about the
expenditures that are going to be made and how that will
contribute to the outcome of their study. Well requesting more
information about the expenditure is not a problem but then the time frame that
it takes to approve the budget for the activities is where my interest lies.
Community engagement helps to
shape various relationships; thus between researchers and local communities,
study participants and study team working in the area, community leaders
and researchers not forgetting a relationship that exist between researchers
and other stakeholders operating in the same catchment area . Imagine a researcher goes in a community to
conduct study procedures without even having an interaction with the local
leaders, other stakeholders and the entire community, what would be the
reaction of the communities towards such a practice? Every community has its
own norms and values which researchers need to observe and adopt some of them. Therefore through community engagement such
relationships are strengthened.
From my experience I have
observed that most Principal Investigators care about results that are brought on the table not what
communities are entitled to know about the their study or what they will say about it. Most researchers do
not take community engagement as something worth investing their resources.
Wellcome Trust which is one of the
funding organization encourages researchers to engage communities where eligible participants come
from, this is also supported by a global
movement to promote community/ public engagement in
research.
| A researcher attending one of the community engagement meetings |
Apart from this community
engagement practice also ensures that there is mutual understanding between
these different groups especially eligible participants. Conducting research in developing countries
like Malawi is good when there is
mutual understanding which leads to trust. Communities need to know at least
most information about the studies that are conducted in their area; they need
to be represented through representatives. Researchers should aim at ensuring
that such a relationship is established at all cost. Previously before community engagement was
promoted in Malawi most communities were denied an opportunity to understand medical
research and why their participation matter a lot, as such there were a lot of
misconceptions associated with research; some said researchers draw blood and
sell it for their own benefits, other attributed other deaths to research
procedures, in worst case scenarios
field teams were not welcomed in other villages because they were considered
Satanists. All this was because there was no any mutual understanding.
On the other hand community
engagement helps to move towards the autonomy of a community. In developing
countries most people are not oriented
on their rights such that they have few
words to say whenever approached to
participate in a study, some of them
don’t know how to differentiate general treatment from a study procedure as such they
accept to participate out of ignorance.
Community engagement practice help to empower communities to have a say in
research studies, the same with eligible participants.
Apart from this through community
engagement we can share with the communities the relevance of studies into
their lives. In most cases studies that
are conducted are planned by researchers and then they are just implemented in
a targeted area without sourcing the views of the local communities. Engaging
communities at the beginning of the study (thus during protocol development and
at the beginning of studies helps to incorporate their views despite that they ideas may not be as professional as researchers would expect. In summary Community Engagement helps to ensure that there is mutual understanding between researchers and communities where research is conducted hence the need to have the process included in the implementation plan of a protocol.
Face-to-face community engagement is resource expensive. Online engagement is far from free if you want to do it well, but it is far more scalable than traditional methods.
ReplyDeleteCommunity Engagement Benefits